Legal Opinion

Romprey v. Brothers

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 3, 1948No. 3762PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The task of determining the testator’s intent in this case is not easy as plausible and able arguments are marshalled for several views. However, the matter must be decided by a balance of probabilities as shown by the surrounding circumstances including the will itself. Osgood v. Vivada, 94 N. H. 222; Rowe v. Rowe, ante, 241, and cases cited. The questions to be answered appear to be as follows : When did the devise of the remainder vest, and to whom and in what proportions should it go? The trustee also desires instructions as to whether the assets shall be converted into cash or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holmes v. AlexanderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Upton v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  3. Burpee v. PickardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  4. O'Brien v. O'LearySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1887
  5. Osgood v. VivadaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Applications to Fix Streetcar Rates of FareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API