Legal Opinion

Roulac v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1977No. Civ. 14666PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AULT, J. *

This is the second appeal resulting from hearings on the petition of appellant Edna Farr Roulac under Probate Code section 1080 for determination of entitlement to distribution of income and corpus of a testamentary trust established by the will of her late husband, John W. Roulac. The substantial and unique question presented by the appeal is: If intestacy, in whole or in part, results because of the order in which the income beneficiaries die, should the testator’s heirs be determined as of the date of his death or as of the date of the termination of the trust?

A threshold…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Estate of HormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Gyerman v. United States Lines Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Wittfield v. ForsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. SchoendorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Estate of McSweeneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Eldridge v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API