Legal Opinion

City of Eugene v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 6, 1988No. 16-88-02472; CA A48266PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant Roberts is the Secretary of State of Oregon. Defendants Faw and Spriggs are election officials of Lane County. The three appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff city of Eugene in this action under ORS 246.910, in which the city challenged the secretary’s directive to the other defendants, and their compliance with her directive, that an “advisory question” which the city council sought to submit to Eugene’s voters not be placed on the May, 1988, state primary election ballot. The trial court granted summary judgment for the city and ordered defendants to put the question on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Cochran v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorrowOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Goldstein v. RadakovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Eugene v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ontiveroz v. KhokharIllinois Supreme Court · 2025
  3. City of Eugene v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API