Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Radakovich

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 27, 1984No. A8209-05754; CA A26279PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

This dispute arose from plaintiffs’ attempt to have their names placed on the 1982 general election ballot. One sought the office of Multnomah County Assessor, the other Multnomah County Clerk. They sought nomination to those offices by an assembly of electors. See ORS 249.735. The issue is whether plaintiffs were properly nominated by qualified assembly electors. The trial court ruled that they were not. We agree and affirm.

On July 23, 1982, plaintiffs held an assembly of electors on the sidewalk in front of a business in downtown Portland. The assembly was called to order at 11:10 a.m., and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Application of AngusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. In re the Marriage of CastroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. McAlmond v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Eugene v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. City of Eugene v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Reeves v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. City of Eugene v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API