Legal Opinion

Securities Inv. Co. v. Armstrong

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This is a replevin suit brought by the investment company for possession of a car; the investment company being the holder of an unsatisfied conditional sale contract retaining title to the car, the contract purchaser being J. B. Thomas. The car was found by the officer in the physical possession of L. C. Johnson, doing business as Auto Painting & Supply Company, and delivered to the investment company. The replevin writ ran against Thomas, Johnson, a’nd J. B. Armstrong, deputy sheriff. The defendant Johnson appeared and defended on the trial of the case, denying the asserted right of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grizzard v. FiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Knoxville Outfitting Co. v. Knoxville, Fireproof Storage Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Robinson Bros. Motor Co. v. KnightTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Diamond Service Station v. Broadway Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Waterbury v. NetherlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anaconda Aluminum Co. v. SharpMississippi Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API