Legal Opinion

Diamond Service Station v. Broadway Motor Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

delivered the opinion of1 the Court.(l) It appears from the ag'reed state of facts, and is conceded in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, Diamond Service Station, herein referred to as defendant, that defendant in error, Broadway Motor Company, herein referred to as plaintiff, sold to Peoples Line Incorporated the automobile described in the writ of replevin, and retained the title until the deferred notes were paid. The conditional vendee, Peoples Line Incorporated, defaulted in payments, and the conditional vendor, the plaintiff, sued out a replevin writ to recover possession so…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shaw v. WebbTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Blackwood Tire & Vulcanizing Co. v. Auto Storage Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Robinson Bros. Motor Co. v. KnightTennessee Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gem Motor Co. v. Securities Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  2. MacK Financial Corp. v. Peterbilt of Chattanooga, Inc. (In Re Glenn)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
  3. MacK's Used Cars & Parts, Inc. v. Tennessee Truck & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  4. McJunkin v. Chattanooga GarageTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Securities Inv. Co. v. ArmstrongTennessee Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API