Legal Opinion
Mauro v. Administrator
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided December 29, 1954No. File 80848PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, J.
The claimant gave his employer notice that he would resign as of July 1, 1954; the employer hired a replacement June 16; on June 21 claimant decided that he would not take the job which he had in contemplation in New Jersey, and on June 23 he attempted to withdraw his resignation. The company told him his job was already filled and that they would not consider the withdrawal. He left his work on July 1, 1954.
The disqualification contained in General Statutes, §7508(2) (a) (as amended, Cum. Sup. 1953, § 2313c), of a person who has left work without sufficient cause connected with his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Consiglio v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. PolinskyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Guy Gannett Publishing Co. v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Wright v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Cotright v. DoyalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Porter v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.