Legal Opinion
State v. Tyler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 22, 2009No. 104,956PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.
¶1 The issues presented are whether: 1) the trial court continued the defendant's arraignment in contravention of 59 0.8. Supp. 2008 § 1832(A); and 2) the trial court's failure to set the hearing for a day certain materially increased the bondsman's risk. We hold that 59 O.S. Supp.2008 $ 1832(A) did not prevent the trial court from continuing the arraignment, but, because the appearance date was not set for a day certain, the bondsman was not properly notified, and her risk was materially increased. The trial court abused its discretion when it refused to exonerate the bond.
FACTS
T2 Regina…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Cox v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- King v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- HARRISON v. OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- State v. TWO JINN, INC.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- First National Bank and Trust Company of Okmulgee v. YoungDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2024
- HARRISON v. OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION AND RETIREMENT SYSTEMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.