Legal Opinion

Prentice v. Yocum

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided April 13, 2023No. 22-01013Unknown

1Opinion

ee □□ SY >. □□ Yo Dated: April 13, 2023 2 Sere . . . 4 eS fe □ The following is ORDERED: <\ MME Gi Gi □□ QUSTR ict □□□ 2 Sarah A Hall United States Bankruptcy Judge UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA In re: ) ) WILLIAM BRADLEY YOCUM, ) Case No. 22-10049-SAH ) Chapter 7 Debtor. ) □□□ ) CHRISTOPHER M. PRENTICE ) and SARAH N. WEBER, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) Adv. Pro, 22-01013-SAH ) WILLIAM BRADLEY YOCUM, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, BRIEF IN SUPPORT, AND NOTICE AND OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING [DOC., 22] In their 68 page First Amended…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API