Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rasheed

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1994No. 172 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1991PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

The questions presented are: whether it is error for the trial court to instruct the jury that it may draw no adverse inference from the decision of the defendant not to testify, when a specific request to omit the instruction has been made; and if so, is the error harmless. 1 We find that the trial court erred in giving the charge over the objection of defense counsel and that the error was not harmless.

This issue arises out of a rape prosecution where the defendant, having asserted a consent defense, chose not to testify. During the discussions regarding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. BrickerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HairstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. DentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API