Commonwealth v. Rasheed
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAPPY, Justice.
The questions presented are: whether it is error for the trial court to instruct the jury that it may draw no adverse inference from the decision of the defendant not to testify, when a specific request to omit the instruction has been made; and if so, is the error harmless. 1 We find that the trial court erred in giving the charge over the objection of defense counsel and that the error was not harmless.
This issue arises out of a rape prosecution where the defendant, having asserted a consent defense, chose not to testify. During the discussions regarding…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Commonwealth v. BrickerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HairstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. DentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.