Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1996No. 106 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1994PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY, Justice.

This case comes before the Court on appellant’s claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the instructions given by the trial court in its final charge to the jury. Appellant asserts that the charge as given was deficient in two specific areas: failure to include a no adverse inference instruction 1 and failure to advise the jury that appellant could be convicted of first degree murder as an accomplice only if appellant possessed the specific intent to kill. The Superior Court rejected appellant’s claims of ineffectiveness and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. HowardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. ProsdocimoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. StokesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Commonwealth v. PaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. MarkmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API