Lucent Technologies Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BRADEN, Judge.
RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On May 6, 2005, the Government filed a Motion to Transfer and Suggestion of the Appropriateness of Consolidation (“Gov’t *513Mot.”), requesting the transfer of Lucent Technologies Inc. v. United States (“Lucent”), No. 04-1511C, from the undersigned judge to the Honorable Charles F. Lettow, because Lucent is “directly related,” within the meaning of RCFC 40.2(a), to two cases that then were pending before Judge Lettow, and, therefore, “[A]ll three cases ... should be handled by a single Judge in order to ‘conserve…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Karuk Tribe of California v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colonial Chevrolet Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Alley's of Kingsport, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Zafer Taahhut Insaat Ve Ticaret, A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Lowry Economic Redevelopment Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- AT & T Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007