Legal Opinion

AT & T Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 26, 2007No. 04-1511CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO COUNT I OF THE COMPLAINT AND COUNT I OF THE COUNTERCLAIM

BRADEN, Judge.

Lucent Technologies Incorporated (“Lu-eent”)’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment requests that the United States Court of Federal Claims interpret whether a “segment closing,” based on a segment sale or transfer, requires the sale or transfer of all of a segment’s contracts and related assets. See 48 C.F.R. §§ 9904.413-30(a)(20)(i), 9904.413-50(e)(12). This is an issue of first impression.

I. RELEVANT FACTS.1

In 1997, Lucent owned an Advanced…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API