Aurnhammer v. Brotherhood Accident Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
This is an action of contract upon an accident insurance policy. It provided (clause 1) that the insured would be paid $9 a week indemnity, if he suffered any bodily injury of the kind set out in the policy; and by clause K, a special indemnity of $60 per week, if the bodily injury should “ be received while said insured is riding as a passenger in any railway passenger car, operated by . . . electricity, . . . and such injury . . . [should] be due directly to or in consequence of the wrecking of said car.”
The parties agreed that the plaintiff was a passenger upon an open, fifteen-bench…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonough v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Campbell v. WhoriskeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Hatch v. United States Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Lewis v. Brotherhood Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Ferguson v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Garden v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Zohner v. Sierra Nevada Life & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Mochel v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Lewis National Corp. v. CollentroMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1965
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.