Legal Opinion

Aurnhammer v. Brotherhood Accident Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 19, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

This is an action of contract upon an accident insurance policy. It provided (clause 1) that the insured would be paid $9 a week indemnity, if he suffered any bodily injury of the kind set out in the policy; and by clause K, a special indemnity of $60 per week, if the bodily injury should “ be received while said insured is riding as a passenger in any railway passenger car, operated by . . . electricity, . . . and such injury . . . [should] be due directly to or in consequence of the wrecking of said car.”

The parties agreed that the plaintiff was a passenger upon an open, fifteen-bench…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McDonough v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Campbell v. WhoriskeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. Hatch v. United States Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Lewis v. Brotherhood Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Ferguson v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Garden v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  2. Zohner v. Sierra Nevada Life & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Mochel v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Lewis National Corp. v. CollentroMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1965
  5. State v. BryantSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API