Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Brotherhood Accident Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1907PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This is an action upon a policy of insurance against accident. The case is before us upon the exceptions taken by the defendant at the trial, in which a verdict for the plaintiff was returned for the full amount claimed.

1. One of the grounds of defence was that there had been no compliance with the arbitration clause. The judge ruled that *3the clause was valid, but submitted to the jury the question whether there had been a waiver; and the jury found a waiver. The question upon this branch of the case is whether this action of the judge was prejudicial to the defendant. We have not found it…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Travellers' Insurance v. McConkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Utter v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Dodge v. Boston & Bangor Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Reed v. Washington Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Shea v. Massachusetts Benefit Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Sargent v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Clark v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Bauer v. International Waste Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API