Legal Opinion

Mochel v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'n

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 5, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

The question presented for . decision is whether the words “train wreck,” as used in the contract of.insurance in suit, are within the meaning and purview of the facts stipulated of record by the parties,to this action. The paragraph of the policy containing the words subject to interpretation reads as follows:

“Whenever a member in good standing shall, from external, violent and accidental means, receive bodily injuries which shall, independently of all other causes result, in death within ninety days from the date of the receipt of said injuries, the beneficiary named in his application for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. Provident Savings Life Assurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Detroit City Railway v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Caron v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Blank v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Jones v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Life Casualty Ins. Co. v. WhitehurstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Brush v. Washington National InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. Carpenter v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Life Casualty Ins. Co., Tennessee v. WhitehurstAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Reddington v. North American Accident Ins. Co. of IllinoisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API