Legal Opinion
Canales v. Roe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 14, 1998No. 97-55171PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:
Carlos Renan-Perez Canales appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition, in which he claimed ineffective assistance of counsel. Canales argued that his trial attorney’s late filing of a notice of appeal triggered a rule of presumed prejudice that entitles him to habeas relief. The district court determined that the Supreme Court had not clearly established a rule of presumed prejudice as a matter of federal law. See Canales v. Roe, 949 F.Supp. 762 (C.D.Cal.1996) (Canales I). It, therefore, denied the writ. We affirm, but on a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kenneth Paul Dows v. Tana WoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Robert Lee Lott v. Glenn A. Mueller, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Clinton K. Lajoie v. S. Frank Thompson, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, No. 98-35919Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jackie G. Wilson v. I.C. Haunani Henry, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Michael Alvarado v. R.Q. Hickman, Warden, Acting Warden of Mule Creek State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.