Legal Opinion

State v. Perez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 18, 1993No. 91CR2171, 88CR2197, 88CR2150, 88CR2198; CA A73180, A73749PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

In this consolidated criminal appeal, defendant seeks reversal of his convictions for conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, ORS 161.450; ORS 475.992, delivery of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, and possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992. He also seeks reversal of three judgments revoking his probation. We affirm.

We recite only the facts pertinent to this appeal. Defendant was involved in a drug transaction that took place in the presence of a paid informant fitted with a body wire. Defendant’s remarks were transmitted via the body wire to a police officer stationed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barker v. IrelandOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API