Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 2014No. 12CR0938FE; A152538Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals a judgment revoking his probation. The trial court determined that defendant had violated his probation by changing his residence without permission and by associating with a known drug user. On appeal, defendant asserts that there was legally insufficient evidence of either probation violation. See State v. Perez, 122 Or App 385, 388, 857 P2d 893 (1993) (court reviews a trial court’s decision to revoke probation for abuse of discretion); State v. Winters, 44 Or App 9, 12, 605 P2d 293 (1980) (a trial court abuses its discretion when it revokes probation based on insufficient…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MilnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API