Crotty v. Borough of Naugatuck
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, in favor of the defendant.1 The plaintiff sought reimbursement pursuant to General Statutes § 53-39a2 from the borough of Naugatuck, where he was employed as a police officer, for legal fees incurred in his defense of perjury charges. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly found that he was not acting in the course of his official duties while testifying before the grand jury-
The plaintiff, a sergeant in the Naugatuck police department, was subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Rawling v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. DeGennaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Texaco, Inc. v. GolartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HarveyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Santana v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Maio v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Fishbein v. MenchettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016