Legal Opinion
James v. State of Maryland
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 30, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01837Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND DEMARCO GREGORY JAMES, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No.: RDB-18-1837 STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION In response to the above-entitled Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Respondent asserts the claims are procedurally defaulted, requiring dismissal of the petition without addressing the merits of the claims. ECF 5. Petitioner Demarco James filed a Reply asserting that since his claims were presented to the highest Maryland court with jurisdiction to hear them, they are not procedurally defaulted. ECF 15. No…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rose v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.