Legal Opinion
May v. Midwest Refining Co.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided May 8, 1935No. 951PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERS, District Judge.
The plaintiff in this case, proceeding under Equity Rule 58 (28 USCA following section- -723), has filed interrogatories, 372 in number, to be answered by one or more of the defendants. To most of these interrogatories objections have been made. The only issue now before the court is whether any of the objections shall be sustained.
Determination of this question requires consideration of the issues involved in the suit as well as applicable principles of law.
The plaintiff is „a stockholder holding 50 shares in the defendant Midwest Refining Company; all the remaining…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Union Pac. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- Wolcott v. National Electric Signaling Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
- Kinney v. RiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
- Wright v. Dodge Bros.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fred R. Canada v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Fred R. Canada v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969