Legal Opinion
Gattis v. Kirk
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 7, 1928No. 508PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKMAN, O. J.
Appellants sued Prank Kirk, J. E. Brewer, Arnold Kirk, and C. C. Neeb for $600 alleged to be due them on a written contract dated March 31,1926, signed by appellants and Arnold Kirk and C. C. Neeb. After the testimony was concluded, the defendants Prank Kirk and J. E. Brewer moved to be dismissed from the suit. The motion was granted and an order entered dismissing them. The action of the trial court in so doing is not before us for review, but this appeal is prosecuted against Arnold Kirk and C. C. Neeb, who are the sole appellees. The written contract upon which the suit was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Bulin v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Kirby Lumber Company v. ConnTexas Supreme Court · 1924
- Citizens' Nat. Bank of Brownwood v. Texas Compress Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Goodwin v. Abilene State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Higgins v. Standard LloydsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Ickert v. MinorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Needham v. American Nat. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Wharton v. Mortgage Bond Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Moller v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.