Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Abilene State Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 8, 1927No. 42PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHickman, J.

The views entertained by the majority of this court, as now constituted, on the different questions presented by this appeal, are such as to require that we write upon it as upon an original hearing. Suit was upon a promissory note executed by D. B. Cozart and W. C. Goodwin to the Abilene State Bank for the principal sum of $7,000. The note declared upon was the eighth renewal of an original note executed to the Guaranty State Bank. Goodwin alone has appealed from the judgment of the trial court. As a defense to the note, appellant, Goodwin, pleaded his suretyship and fraud on the part of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Stewart v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Brown v. SullivanTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Briscoe v. BronaughTexas Supreme Court · 1846
  4. McDonald v. CabinessTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Houston & T. C. R. R. Co. v. ShirleyTexas Supreme Court · 1880

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sumitomo Bank of Cal. v. IwasakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Nautical Landings Marina, Inc. v. First National Bank in Port Lavaca, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  3. City of Richland Hills v. BertelsenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. City Nat. Bank v. Eastland CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Kelsey v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API