In re the Arbitration between Kreiss & Hotaling
California Supreme Court
Appeal from ’ an'order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco refusing to vacate and set aside an award of arbitrators, and perpetually staying a judgment entered by the clerk upon the award, and all proceedings thereunder. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
— A dispute having arisen between respondent and appellant as to the balance, if any, due from the latter to the former for certain work done by him in decorating appellant’s dwelling-house, a contract was entered into, by the terms of which they agreed to submit the matter in controversy to two arbitrators, who were authorized to choose an umpire in the event of their inability to agree. It was stipulated that the submission to arbitration should be filed with the clerk and entered as an order of the superior court. The arbitrators were unable to agree upon an award, and Augustus Laver was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Bank of Stockton v. L. L. Howland & Co.California Supreme Court · 1871
- Holdridge v. StowellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Fink v. FinkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Myers v. EasterwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1883
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Hayashi v. LorenzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Endresse v. Van VleetMontana Supreme Court · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.