Legal Opinion
Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. Mayfair Markets
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided February 14, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 162588PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlen, J.
Plaintiff brought this action on behalf of its assignor for one week’s vacation pay alleged to be due its assignor from defendant employer. This appeal is on the judgment roll alone, findings of fact and conclusions of law having been waived in the trial court.
*945Plaintiff’s assignor was employed as a clerk by defendant under a collective bargaining contract negotiated between the defendant and the Eetail Clerks Union. Insofar as material here, the contract provides as follows:
“Section VII. Vacations:
"(A) When the regular employee has been in the employ of the Employer for twelve (12)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Zwolanek v. Baker Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Roberts v. . MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Roberts v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Posner v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
- Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. Ryan Aeronautical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Briggs v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- CALIFORNIA STATE AUTO. ASSN. INTER-INS. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.