Legal Opinion

Sandra Marshall v. Honeywell Technology Systems

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 12, 2016No. 14-7190Published

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 8, 2015 Decided July 12, 2016 No. 14-7190 SANDRA MARSHALL, APPELLANT v. HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INC, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:05-cv-02502) JoAnn Patricia Myles argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant. Leslie Paul Machado argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief were Sarah E. Moffett, Paul W. Mengel III, Julia D. Di Vito, Zachary S. Stinson, M. Ginger McCauley, and John B. Flood. Isaias I. Alba entered an…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  4. Browning Manufacturing v. Mims (In Re Coastal Plains, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. Scarano v. Central R. Co. Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API