Legal Opinion
Clendenny v. Architect of the Capitol
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 15, 2017No. Civil Action No. 14-115 (RDM)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Charles Clendenny and Mark Ingram bring this action against their employer, the Architect of the Capitol (“AOC”), for an alleged violation' of the Congressional Accountability Act, 2 U.S.C. § 1301 et seq. (“CAA”). Plaintiffs are employed as insulators at the AOC, and their responsibilities include performing “asbestos abatement” procedures in the buildings used by the United States House of Representatives. They allege that, after refusing to use a vacuum they believed to be unsafe to perform an abatement…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McManus v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Plunkett v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Casselle v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Anderson v. Bdo USA, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Brisbon v. PoteatDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.