Legal Opinion

Stephens v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 2, 1930No. 5775PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

The six appellants, Stephens, Spicer, Wotkyns, Hallawell, Wells, and Steward, were convicted upon all counts but one in an indictment returned May 24, 1928, charging them on each of the! first seventeen counts with using the mails to defrand (Cr. Code, § 215, 18 USCA § 338), and in the eighteenth count with a conspiracy to commit such offenses. On motion of the district attorney the seventh count was dismissed and reference hereinafter made to the first seventeen counts will he understood as excluding this one. The charges all have to do with the transactions of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Brady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. Stokes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Horn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. ReadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Tinkoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  4. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  5. Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API