Horn v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. Frank H. Horn and others were convicted! of devising a scheme to defraud, to be effected by means of the post office establishment, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
REED, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in error, Frank H. Horn, Elisha 'S. Horn, Raymond P. May, and! S. H. Snider, who will be called the “defendants,” were convicted upon an indictment which charges them jointly with John E. Horn with having violated section 5480, as amended, of the Revised Statutes of the United States (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3696), and they prosecute this writ of error to reverse such judgment. John E. Horn does not complain of the judgment against him and dloes not join in the prosecution of the writ of error. Upon being arraigned the defendants demurred to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Cochran & Sayre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Rudd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Stokes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hewitt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Cochran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Brady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Chew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.