Legal Opinion
Burke v. Utah Transit Authority & Local 382
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 1, 2006No. 05-4079, 05-4222PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.
Recognizing the need for more public transportation options in Utah’s capital, the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) formulated a plan to add light rail service in Salt Lake City in the mid-1990s. Salt Lake City has long offered public transportation, beginning in 1904 with streetcar services and eventually changing exclusively to bus services. Since its inception, Local 382 of the Amalgamated Transit Union has continuously represented the employees of Utah’s public transit system. Therefore, it was no surprise that when UTA established light rail service, Local 382 became…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bliss v. FrancoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Moore v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Exum v. United States Olympic CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Cerveny v. Aventis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Lindsey v. HylerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- City of Colorado Springs v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Sprint Communications Company L.P., v. Vonage Holdings Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.