Legal Opinion
City of Colorado Springs v. Solis
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 23, 2009No. 09-1029PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Section 13(c) of the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964 (“UMTA”), now codified at 49 U.S.C. § 5333(b), requires state and local governments seeking federal financial assistance for transit operations to have in place “fair and equitable” provisions for the protection of employees. Each time an applicant requests funds from the Federal Transit Administration (“FTA”) under UMTA, the Secretary of Labor must certify that § 13(c) is satisfied.
Since 1981, the City of Colorado Springs, Colorado (“the City”) has been a party to a labor agreement with Amalgamated Transit Union,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Colony Insurance Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Smart v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Zia Shadows, L.L.C. v. City of Las CrucesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. BenoitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.