Legal Opinion

Melomed v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 2009No. 1900 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge BUTLER.

Alla Melomed (Claimant) petitions this Court, pro se, for review of the August 11, 2008, Decision and Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying Claimant unemployment benefits pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Section 402(e)), 1 which pertains to unem ployment due to discharge for “willful misconduct.” Our review is limited to determining whether Claimant’s constitutional rights were violated, whether an error of law was committed, or whether the necessary factual findings are supported by substantial evidence.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sheets v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. First Federal Savings Bank v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Williams v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Miokovic Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Pearson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Diehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Betres Group, Inc. v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. J.S. Kirchner v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. M.D. Callahan v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. S. Minton v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API