Legal Opinion

Diehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 20, 2010PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

In this appeal,1 Harold G. Diehl, Jr. (Claimant) asks whether the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) erred in denying him unemployment benefits. The Board denied Claimant benefits on the ground that he voluntarily quit his employment to accept an early retirement incentive and continuing work was available to Claimant.

Claimant primarily argues the Board’s decision ignored the clear and unambiguous language of the “voluntary layoff option” proviso (VLO proviso) contained in Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law2 (Law) (“no otherwise eligible…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Novelty Knitting Mills, Inc. v. SiskindSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Tapco, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Caterpillar, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Pallet v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Diehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (ESAB Group, Inc.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Hoffman v. Borough of MacungieCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Elliott Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. C.W. Young v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. E. Farag v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API