Legal Opinion

Strief v. Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1995No. 1993-2507PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 318.] STRIEF, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as Strief v. Cincinnati,

1995-Ohio-192.] Municipal corporations—Torts—Limitations on damages awarded—"Benefit" as used in R.C. 2744.05(B) does not include monies advanced to an injured party by a union benefit plan that must be reimbursed from a subsequent judgment pursuant to a subrogation agreement between the injured party and the plan. (No. 93-2507—Submitted March 22, 1995—Decided June 14, 1995.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KilbaneOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Menefee v. Queen City MetroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Vogel v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Rogers v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Strief v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Community Ins. Co. v. Ohio Dept. of Transp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API