Legal Opinion
Rogers v. City of Youngstown
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1991No. 90-1500PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The primary question presented for our review is whether the city had a duty, pursuant to R.C. 2744.07(A)(1), to defend appellee in the suit filed in federal court by Rogers, appellee’s sister. R.C. 2744.07(A)(1) provides, in relevant part, that:
“Except as otherwise provided in this division, a political subdivision shall provide for the defense of an employee, in any state or federal court, in any civil action or proceeding to recover damages for injury, death, or loss to persons or property allegedly caused by an act or omission of the employee in connection with a governmental or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Vogel v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by8 opinions
- Whaley v. Franklin County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Whaley v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
- Brooks v. City of WeirtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Carmichael v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
- Strief v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.