Legal Opinion

United States v. Duardi

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided November 12, 1974No. 23939-1PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDERS GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS GOVERNMENT’S SECTION 3575(a) NOTICE AND DENYING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND SAID NOTICE

JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.

I

Pursuant to orders entered September 17, 1974, this case now pends on (1) defendants’ motion to strike the government’s original Section 3575(a) notice; and (2) the government’s motion for leave to file an amended Section 3575(a) notice. For reasons we shall state in detail, defendants’ motion to strike will be granted and the government’s motion for leave to amend its original notice will be denied.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. BurnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. United States v. George Tom Darby, Constantine Yamanis, Vincent Calise, and Michael YamanisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. FaticoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  4. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. United States v. Joseph J. NearyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API