People v. Burnick
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Professor Wigmore perceptively observes that “The mental condition of one whose mind is so deranged as to require imprisonment for his own and others’ good is indeed pitiable. But the mental attitude of one who is falsely found insane and relegated to life imprisonment is [May 1975] *310beyond conception. No greater cruelty can be committed in the name of the law.” (5 Wigmore on Evidence (Chadbourn rev. 1974) § 1400, p. 201.)
Surely it is no less cruel to falsely find a man to be a “mentally disordered sex offender” and confine him indefinitely in a prison-like state mental…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by193 opinions
- Oscar W. Jones v. Lou Blanas County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.