Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles Fred Rocha

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 27, 1972No. 71-1166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted in March, 1966 of having violated 21 U.S.C. § 174 and 26 U.S.C. § 4704(a) and on appeal to this court his conviction was affirmed. Rocha v. United States, 387 F.2d 1019 (9th Cir. 1967). The only challenge to the conviction raised on appeal was that the trial court should have granted his pre-trial motion to suppress certain evidence.

The present appeal is from an Order . of the district court, made and filed on November 25, 1970, denying the motion of appellant for relief under and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

The issues presented are: (1) Whether it was prejudicial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Charles Frederick Rocha v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. United States v. MarcheseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. Earnest Hammond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howard v. DaggettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. RameyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981
  3. Stephen Robley Evans v. John Mitchell, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API