Legal Opinion

Charles Frederick Rocha v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 18, 1968No. 21111PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:

Charles Frederick Rocha appeals from his conviction on a charge of concealing and facilitating the concealment of heroin in violation of the Narcotic Drugs Import and Export Act, 35 Stat. 614 (1909) as amended, 21 U.S.C. § 174 (1964).

Rocha’s only point on appeal is that the trial court should have granted his pretrial motion to suppress certain evidence and therefore erred in admitting the evidence at the trial. The evidence in question consists of 57.585 grams of heroin which was found at Rocha’s service station as a result of a search made immediately after his arrest…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. HenningTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. United States v. Demetrius RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. United States v. Domingo S. Canieso and Siu Tsien ChouCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Joseph Baldamar CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API