Legal Opinion

King v. King

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1934No. Appeal 29PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This was an action of divorce brought by a husband against his wife, on the ground of wilful and malicious desertion. It was tried before a jury, who rendered a verdict in favor of the libellant. The duty resting upon this court in appeals in divorce cases heard before a master, to review the testimony and decide on our own judgment whether it sustains, by clear and satisfactory proof, the complaint of the libellant (Nacrelli v. Nacrelli, 288 Pa. 1, 5, 136 A. 228; Nacrelli v. Nacrelli, 87 Pa. Superior Ct. 162, 164; Humphreys v. Humphreys, 85 Pa. Superior Ct. 488, 491;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Middleton v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Nacrelli v. NacrelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Nacrelli, Etc. v. NacrelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Stewart v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Burns v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Huston v. HustonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Rinoldo v. RinoldoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Thomas v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Eberly v. EberlySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Mayer v. MayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API