Legal Opinion

Burns v. Burns

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1924No. Appeal, 189PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The Act of April 20, 1911, P. L. 71, amending the Divorce Act of March 13, 1815, P. L. 150, which first authorized the court of common pleas to appoint a master “to take the testimony and return the same to the court, together with a report of the proceedings had before him, and his opinion of the case,” effected no change in the duty of that court, or of this court on appeal, as respects a consideration of all the evidence and the determination of the facts therefrom. The court of common pleas must still be satisfied by its own knowledge of the testimony that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Middleton v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Ingersoll v. IngersollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
  3. Reynolds v. ReynoldsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. McCampbell v. McCampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Giles v. GilesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nacrelli v. NacrelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Rinoldo v. RinoldoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Nacrelli, Etc. v. NacrelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Hewitt v. HewittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Stewart v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API