Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Royal School Dist. No. 160

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 2005No. 75214-1PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

124 P.3d 283 (2005)

156 Wash.2d 62

Certification from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington in Leslie CHRISTENSEN, a minor; Gary Christensen and Kim Christensen, father and mother, individually and on behalf of their minor child, Plaintiffs,

v.

ROYAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 160, a political subdivision; and Preston "Kent" Andersen, Defendants.

No. 75214-1.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued September 23, 2004.

Decided December 8, 2005.

Robert Crotty, Burke Jackowich, Tami Wilcox, Kelly E. Konkright, Spokane, for Plaintiff.

David Soderland, Attorney at Law,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Niece v. Elmview Group HomeWashington Supreme Court · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Simonetta v. Viad Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Bjerke v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Gregoire v. City of Oak HarborWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Gregoire v. City of Oak HarborWashington Supreme Court · 2010

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API