Legal Opinion

State v. Spotts

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1999No. S-98-228PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Brian Ernest Spotts was charged by information with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-416 (Reissue 1995). The State also filed a petition for disposition of seized moneys, seeking forfeiture of $14,177 found on Spotts’ person at the time of his arrest. Following a trial on the forfeiture action, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-431 (Cum. Supp. 1998), the district court found in favor of the State, and Spotts forfeited the $14,177. Spotts filed a plea in bar to the information, alleging that subsequent prosecution…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. One 1987 Toyota PickupNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. HowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. FrancoNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. BelmarezNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. ManjikianNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. McCrackenNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. BottolfsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API