Legal Opinion

State v. Howell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1998No. S-96-1295PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

This case presents the question, Does the administrative revocation of a driver’s license for refusal to submit to a chemical test constitute punishment, such that any subsequent criminal prosecution puts the offender twice in jeopardy? Although we addressed a similar question in State v. Hansen, 249 Neb. 177, 542 N.W.2d 424 (1996), we now readdress Nebraska’s administrative license revocation statute, applying the U.S. Supreme Court’s analysis from Hudson v. United States, 522 U.S. 93, 118 S. Ct. 488, 139 L. Ed. 2d 450 (1997). We conclude that administrative license revocation for failure to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. McCrackenNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. WormNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Slansky v. Nebraska State PatrolNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. KulaNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API