State v. Franco
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Juan Franco, Jr., was charged by information with one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. Franco filed a plea in bar, alleging that the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the U.S. and Nebraska Constitutions barred his prosecution because jeopardy had attached at the forfeiture trial involving property which was owned by Franco and in his possession at the time of the arrest. The district court denied the plea in bar, and Franco timely perfected this appeal.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
An appeal from a denial of a plea in bar involves a question of law. State v.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. NunezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. ManjikianNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. McCrackenNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BottolfsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.