Legal Opinion

Betz v. Tower Savings Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1936No. 25954. Department TwoPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

In their amended complaint in this action, plaintiffs alleged the corporate existence of the two defendants first named in the caption of the action, and that the third defendant, John Bjorklund, was the regularly elected sheriff of Pierce county. Plaintiffs then alleged that, during the month of May, 1930, they were the owners of a tract of land in Tacoma, upon a portion of which stood the “Betz Building;” that the land was reasonably worth $125,000, and that defendant Tower Savings Bank (hereinafter referred to as the bank) loaned plaintiffs $42,000, accepting as security therefor a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Peyton v. PeytonWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Parker v. DacresWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Chezum v. ClaypoolWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Atwood v. McGrathWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State ex rel. Post v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Speckner v. RieboldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hazel v. Van BeekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. HaleMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hazel v. Van BeekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Speckner v. RieboldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API