Legal Opinion
Acadia Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 24, 1995No. 94-1335, 94-1450PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Chief Judge.
This appeal involves a dispute between thirty-two Maine automobile dealers (the “Dealers”) and Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) over Ford’s compliance with the Maine warranty reimbursement statute, 10 M.R.S.A. § 1176 (Me.Rev.Stat.Ann., tit. 10 § 1176 (West 1994)). On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court ruled that in order to comply with the Maine statute, Ford must revise the window stickers on its cars sold in Maine to reflect the surcharge Ford had instituted to recover its costs of complying with § 1176. The district court refused, however, to award…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Vartanian v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Federal Trade Commission v. BrochSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Ass'n v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Aybar v. Crispin-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Alliance of Auto. Mfrs. v. GwadoskyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- General Motors Corp. v. Darling'sCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Liberty Lincoln-Mercury v. Ford Motor Company, in No. 96-5762. Liberty Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, in No. 97-5189. Liberty Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., in No. 97-5190 v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Paduano v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.