People v. Moriarity
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge NIETO.
Defendant, Jeremiah J. Moriarity, appeals the trial court's order denying his Crim. P. 35(c) motion for post-conviction relief, We affirm, but remand for correction of the mit-timus.
In February 1996, defendant pled guilty to one count of first degree assault-heat of passion, a class-five felony, and was sentenced to the Department of Corrections (DOC) for three years, the maximum in the presumptive range. Although it is not reflected on the mittimus, defendant must also serve an additional two-year period of mandatory parole. Section 18-1-105(1)(a)(V)(A), C.R.S.1999.
Defen…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Deutschendorf v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Benavidez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- People v. District Court, Arapahoe CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- St. James v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. ZunigaColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. XiongColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Wolford v. Pinnacol AssuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2004