Legal Opinion

Spinning v. Allen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1895No. 1467PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

Frank R. Spinning, the husband of the plaintiff, was a stockholder in the Hastie Dumber Company, a corporation organized and doing business in this state. On June 13, 1892, he delivered to one N. M. Singleton the following instrument:

“ Messrs. Allen & Lewis,
"Portland, Org.
“ Dear Sirs : — The bearer, 1ST. M. Singleton, visits Portland for the purpose of purchasing supplies for the Hastie Dumber Company of Puyallup, Washington. I will guarantee the payment of goods sold to them until further notice.

‘ ‘ Please keep me advised of the amount of…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Horton v. Donohoe Kelly Banking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Warren v. Washington Trust BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Floding v. DenholmWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Beyers v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Allen v. ChambersWashington Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API